This Note compares the Morrocan-Polisario Front conflict over Western Sahara to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in hopes of taking the...

By examining the historical precedent and contemporary manifestations of sexual violence in armed conflicts and honing in on the...

This Note looks to see whether a fiduciary claim similar to the one found in Trevorrow v State of South Australia may be replicated in a...

Inspired by the work of Benjamin B. Ferencz, this Article proposes separating the International Criminal Court's Trust Fund for Victims...

The key argument of this Article is that Ben Ferencz did not simply pioneer the field of international criminal justice, for which he was...

This Article critiques the practice of head of state immunity in some countries and the ban of such immunity under international criminal...

This Essay examines the role of precusor that the jurisprudence on "other inhumane acts" can play to anitcipate the express incorporation...

This Essay discusses the ICC's current jurisdiction over the crime of aggression, the gaps in the jurisdictional regime, and how States...

This piece introduces and contextualizes Ferencz’s worldview during the Cold War by situating it among several prominent Cold War...

This Note conducts an analysis of the ways in which fashion brands are utilizing artificial intelligence tools with a particular focus on generative artificial intelligence.

Adopting a statute or amendment that affords claimants in Nazi-looted art disputes a rebuttable presumption of duress would: (1) continue to effectuate U.S. policy on Nazi-looted art disputes; (2) account for the historical landscape and realities of Nazi persecution underlying such transactions; and (3) encourage future Nazi-looted art claims and support their resolution on the merits.

The purpose of this Article is to evaluate the efficacy of the Court’s provisional measures order in South Africa v. Israel through an examination of the participants’ goals, the Court’s strategic choices, and the discernible impact of the decision in its immediate aftermath.

This Article is the last in a series of three articles on how Korea’s struggle for prosecutorial independence offers a window into the nature of the concept. The first Article explains the historical and doctrinal foundations of Korea’s system and the second is an interview-based study of how prosecutorial independence is lost.

This Note demonstrates the need for practical measures that international regulators can implement to overcome the historical challenges of legal harmonization of cross-border surrogacy.

The goal of this Note, then, is twofold: 1) to determine whether the outbound investment regulations are consistent with American economic interests; and 2) to shed light on the alternative routes, manners, and methodologies that the Treasury may take in implementing its newly created outbound investment review board.

Many blame dictatorial regimes for mass atrocities, making democracy appear as a sound solution. This is oversimplified.

Advocates should reframe the issues underlying the relationship between the United States and Puerto Rico in foreign policy terms.

The U.S., along with state-level recognition practices, provides tribes with a degree of flexibility to pursue relationships with states.

Recovering early twentieth century rights claims is important because of the progressive ways in which rights were often understood.

Proactive regulatory layers and strategies will be delineated and scrutinized in this Article.